Baseball Toaster: The Griddle : Who's at bat, part two? (CASE CLOSED)

Rank	Team	W	L	PCT	Division
1	Chicago Cubs	97	64	.602	C1
2	Philadelphia	92	70	.568	E1
3	Los Angeles Dodgers	84	78	.519	W1
4	Milwaukee	90	72	.556	C2
5	New York Mets	89	73	.549	E2
6	Houston	86	75	.534	C3
7	St. Louis	86	76	.531	C4
8	Florida	84	77	.522	E3
9	Arizona	82	80	.506	W2
10T	Colorado	74	88	.457	W3
10T	Cincinnati	74	88	.457	C5
12T	Atlanta	72	90	.444	E4
12T	San Francisco	72	90	.444	W4
14	Pittsburgh	67	95	.414	C6
15	San Diego	63	99	.389	W5
16	Washington	59	102	.366	E5

American League

Rank	Team	W	L	PCT	Division
1	Los Angeles Angels	100	62	.617	W1
2	Tampa Bay	97	65	.599	E1
3	Chicago White Sox	89	74	.546	C1
4	Boston	95	67	.586	E2
5	New York Yankees	89	73	.549	E3
6	Minnesota	88	75	.540	C2
7	Toronto	86	76	.531	E4
8	Cleveland	81	81	.500	C3
9	Texas	79	83	.488	W2
10	Oakland	75	86	.466	W3
11	Kansas City	75	87	.463	C4
12	Detroit	74	88	.457	C5
13	Baltimore	68	93	.422	E5
14	Seattle	61	101	.377	W4

Random Game Callbacks

Select a date:

So where is that book?

Personal favorites that I wrote

The Metro Area Battles

New York

W L GB

Yankees 89 73

Mets 89 73

Baltimore/DC

W L GB

X - Orioles 68 93

Nationals 59 102 9

Chicago

W L GB

X - Cubs 97 64

White Sox 89 74 9

LA/Orange County

W L GB

X - Angels 100 62

Dodgers 84 78 16

SF/Oakland

W L GB

X - Athletics 76 85

Giants 72 90 4.5

X - Clinched

So long and thanks for playing this year

1. Washington (8/31)
2. Seattle (9/1)
3. Pittsburgh (9/6) *
3. San Diego (9/6) *
5. Baltimore (9/8)
6. Oakland (9/8)
7. Atlanta (9/9)
8. Kansas City (9/9)
9. Cincinnati (9/10)
10. Texas (9/13)
11. Detroit (9/15)
12. San Francisco (9/17)
13. Colorado (9/18)
14. Cleveland (9/19)
15. Toronto (9/21)
16. New York Yankees (9/23)
17. St. Louis (9/23)
18. Florida (9/23)
19. Arizona (9/25)
20. Houston (9/26)
21. New York Mets (9/28)
22. Minnesota (9/30)
23. Chicago Cubs (10/4)
24. Milwaukee (10/5)
25. Chicago White Sox (10/6)
26. Los Angeles Angels (10/6)

* - Teams eliminated at same time

The last batter to reach on catcher's interference was ...

Seth McClung of Milwaukee by Koyie Hill of the Cubs on September 26, 2008.

FAQs

At least I think they should be.

Cycle alerts

Yellow alert - Player needs triple for cycle
Orange alert - Player needs double for cycle
Red alert - Player need single for cycle

If a player needs a home run for the cycle, the level of the alert varies depending upon the determination of the Cycle Detection Warning System, which is headquartered in Thief River Falls, Minnesota.

Syndication

About the Toaster

Baseball Toaster runs on some experimental software called Fairpole. It's still under development.

For more information, please visit the Fairpole blog, or read the FAQ.

Who's at bat, part two? (CASE CLOSED)

2008-07-20 15:18

by Bob Timmermann

This time, I don't know the answer and the photo below is on display at the Los Angeles Public Library's Central Library.

It's from Game 4 of the 1963 World Series. So your choices are:

Bobby Richardson
Tom Tresh
Mickey Mantle
Clete Boyer
Phil Linz

Those were the only five right-handed, fair-skinned batters for the Yankees in the game. I'm leaning to Richardson as the photographer would have tried to take a shot early in the game. Richardson was batting second. And the batter is choking up a bit on the bat, which is not something Mantle or Tresh would have done.

Don't be fooled by the fact that all the crowd was in their seats. This other photo taken of Koufax warming up and getting ready to face leadoff man Tony Kubek, shows an equally full house.

Photo by Gordon Dean of the Hollywood Citizen News

UPDATE - I posted the query to the SABR mailing list. So far I have received word from people who insist that the batter is Bobby Richardson. Or Tom Tresh. Or Mickey Mantle. Or possibly either Richardson or Tresh. And it would only be a few more months before the Warren Commission was assembled to study such matters from the time this photo was taken.

Wayne McElreavy has sent me a link to a picture of a 1961 baseball card showing Bobby Richardson at bat. Richardson is holding the bat almost exactly like the batter in the photo.

Advertisement

Comments

2008-07-18 10:41:47

1. larry slimfast

It's Cody Ross's mom.

2008-07-18 10:41:48

2. Xeifrank

What's amazing, is how well behaved the fans sitting in the LCF bleachers seem to be.
vr, Xei

2008-07-18 10:48:52

3. DXMachina

He's nowhere near big enough to be Mantle, and the facial silhouette doesn't look right for Mickey, either.

2008-07-18 10:56:54

4. Calyankee

Looks like Richardson to me.

2008-07-18 11:02:37

5. DXMachina

Ya know, looking up pictures of Richardson, Tresh, Boyer, and Linz, it's amazing how much they all sort of resemble each other. I don't think it's Boyer, because he seems to have had a perpetual five o'clock shadow. Richardson was a lot shorter than the others, but it's hard to tell how tall the batter is in the picture.

2008-07-18 11:35:01

6. Cliff Corcoran

3 No way that's Mantle. Otherwise, you got me, but he looks like he's gonna swing and miss.

2008-07-18 11:55:01

7. Bob Timmermann

If it is Richardson, he didn't strike out in t his at bat. He fouled out to catcher.

2008-07-18 11:59:17

8. old dodger fan

Your library has much more interesting pictures than mine does.

2008-07-18 12:44:51

9. Suffering Bruin

I always knew Dodger Stadium had bigger dimensions back then but it's still disorienting to see 410 in left center. Also, I see white was very much the "in" color back then. Tom Seaver described the Dodger stadium mound as "like falling off a mountain" but I'm not so sure looking at this photo.

Nice photo from the year of my birth. For all I know, I was in momma's arms watching the game on television. She was a Yankee fan back then, living in Tuscon, holding an oversized baby and waiting for her baseball hero, the Mick, to step up to the plate. I wonder if she could sense the large baby squirming in pain with every reverential thought given to a Yankee. I'm sure she must have noticed.

2008-07-18 12:54:04

10. 68elcamino427

No padding on those wooden walls - Ouch!

2008-07-18 12:54:58

11. El Lay Dave

The shortness of Koufax's shadow (I thought it was always long!) would seem to corroborate your supposition of early in the (Sunday day) game. In fact, assuming a 1:05 start, top of the first might seem likely.

Is it certain that Hector Lopez, who batted in the 2nd, is too dark? And check out his grip. (Yeah, just a posed photo.) http://tinyurl.com/5h8pz9

2008-07-18 12:55:57

12. Bob Hendley

Didn't Linz wear glasses?

2008-07-18 14:02:16

13. Eric Enders

It's not Mantle. Here's a photo of Mantle taken in Game 4. Note that he's wearing a white undershirt with longer sleeves than his jersey -- I don't think our guy is -- and that he's also displaying more white in his stirrup sock than the guy in our photo. And not choking up.
http://tinyurl.com/6ysf5r

Here's a photo of the first pitch of the game. The shadows are in exactly the same position as in our photo. Note where the shadow line is on the fans in the top rows of the pavilion.
http://tinyurl.com/6ozw4u

2008-07-18 14:35:04

14. Bob Timmermann

I think the batter is too fair-skinned to be Hector Lopez.

It has to be a first inning batter because of the crowd shot. The crowd in the LF pavilion right before Kubek hits is identical to the crowd where our mystery man is hitting.

Somebody would have to have gone to the bathroom!

2008-07-18 16:04:49

15. larry slimfast

13 Why is Mantle hitting lefty?

2008-07-18 16:26:05

16. Eric Enders

16 The image was apparently inadvertently reversed. If you look carefully you can read KROY WEN on his jersey.

2008-07-18 16:26:40

17. Eric Enders

Also note the left-handed catcher.

2008-07-18 16:35:01

18. larry slimfast

I wondered why approximately 90% of the crowd was left-handed too. I just couldn't put 2 and 2 together...

2008-07-18 17:47:05

19. Bob Timmermann

I would also add that another reason why this picture has to be in the first inning is that the mound is still in relatively pristine shape. If it were the second inning, both Koufax and Ford would have messed it up more.

Also, the batter's box lines are still visible.

2008-07-18 20:52:17

20. popup

Great photos Bob. I am not sure of the identity of the batter in this photo or the previous one. It is odd though that a midget sized Willie Davis appears to be playing just beyond the back slope of the mound.

Stan from Tacoma

2008-07-20 16:12:34

21. DXMachina

Maybe there was a second batter.

But whoever that is up there, it ain't Mantle.

2008-07-20 19:18:01

22. Bob Timmermann

Besides Eric Enders other proof about Mantle another person has pointed out that Willie Davis is playing the batter straight away, which he most assuredly wouldn't have done with Mantle at the plate.

2008-07-21 06:50:58

23. DXMachina

Also, if we're sure that it's the first inning, our only choices are Richardson or Tresh. Mantle didn't get up until the second.

2008-07-21 07:02:58

24. Bob Timmermann

One of the Mantle supporters tells me that he doesn't care about the undershirt and he insists that the field could still be from the second inning.

But I can't believe the field would still be in that condition after one full inning.

The mound is nearly pristine and you can still make out the outline of the batter's box.

Advertisement