Baseball Toaster The Griddle
Log in | Register | Help
A place where a man can slow down to a walk and live his life full measure, but he has to keep his watch on Pacific Time.
Hot from the Toaster
Search
Google Search
Web
Toaster
The Griddle
Archives

2008
11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2007
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2006
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2005
12  10  07 
06  05  04  03 
Suggestions, comments, ring the catcher's interference alarm?

Email me at btimmermann@gmail.com

NCAA Tournament Contest Champion

Andrew Shimmin

2008 contest

Links
The stuff I keep track of
2008 Conference Standings FINAL
National League
Rank Team W L PCT Division
1 Chicago Cubs 97 64 .602 C1
2 Philadelphia 92 70 .568 E1
3 Los Angeles Dodgers 84 78 .519 W1
4 Milwaukee 90 72 .556 C2
5 New York Mets 89 73 .549 E2
6 Houston 86 75 .534 C3
7 St. Louis 86 76 .531 C4
8 Florida 84 77 .522 E3
9 Arizona 82 80 .506 W2
10T Colorado 74 88 .457 W3
10T Cincinnati 74 88 .457 C5
12T Atlanta 72 90 .444 E4
12T San Francisco 72 90 .444 W4
14 Pittsburgh 67 95 .414 C6
15 San Diego 63 99 .389 W5
16 Washington 59 102 .366 E5
American League
Rank Team W L PCT Division
1 Los Angeles Angels 100 62 .617 W1
2 Tampa Bay 97 65 .599 E1
3 Chicago White Sox 89 74 .546 C1
4 Boston 95 67 .586 E2
5 New York Yankees 89 73 .549 E3
6 Minnesota 88 75 .540 C2
7 Toronto 86 76 .531 E4
8 Cleveland 81 81 .500 C3
9 Texas 79 83 .488 W2
10 Oakland 75 86 .466 W3
11 Kansas City 75 87 .463 C4
12 Detroit 74 88 .457 C5
13 Baltimore 68 93 .422 E5
14 Seattle 61 101 .377 W4
Random Game Callbacks

Select a date:

So where is that book?

Personal favorites that I wrote
The Metro Area Battles

New York
WLGB
Yankees8973
Mets8973

Baltimore/DC
WLGB
X - Orioles6893
Nationals591029

Chicago
WLGB
X - Cubs9764
White Sox89749

LA/Orange County
WLGB
X - Angels10062
Dodgers847816

SF/Oakland
WLGB
X - Athletics7685
Giants72904.5

X - Clinched

So long and thanks for playing this year

1. Washington (8/31)
2. Seattle (9/1)
3. Pittsburgh (9/6) *
3. San Diego (9/6) *
5. Baltimore (9/8)
6. Oakland (9/8)
7. Atlanta (9/9)
8. Kansas City (9/9)
9. Cincinnati (9/10)
10. Texas (9/13)
11. Detroit (9/15)
12. San Francisco (9/17)
13. Colorado (9/18)
14. Cleveland (9/19)
15. Toronto (9/21)
16. New York Yankees (9/23)
17. St. Louis (9/23)
18. Florida (9/23)
19. Arizona (9/25)
20. Houston (9/26)
21. New York Mets (9/28)
22. Minnesota (9/30)
23. Chicago Cubs (10/4)
24. Milwaukee (10/5)
25. Chicago White Sox (10/6)
26. Los Angeles Angels (10/6)
27. Los Angeles Dodgers (10/15)
28. Boston (10/19)
29. Tampa Bay (10/29)

* - Teams eliminated at same time

The last batter to reach on catcher's interference was ...

Seth McClung of Milwaukee by Koyie Hill of the Cubs on September 26, 2008.

FAQs
Cycle alerts

Yellow alert - Player needs triple for cycle
Orange alert - Player needs double for cycle
Red alert - Player need single for cycle

If a player needs a home run for the cycle, the level of the alert varies depending upon the determination of the Cycle Detection Warning System, which is headquartered in Thief River Falls, Minnesota.

Syndication

rss2.0

Add to My Yahoo!
The tricky business of counting racial backgrounds of MLB players
2008-10-10 11:21
by Bob Timmermann

Carl Bialik of the Wall Street Journal has an interesting post about how difficult it can be to count up the racial makeup of MLB players.

In the past decade, though, dozens of articles have lamented the declining proportion of black players, from 27% of all major leaguers in the mid-1970s to 8.2% last season, even as the percentage of Americans who are of African descent has inched up in recent decades.

For all its currency, that decline appears to be way off. In recent years, two baseball researchers, working independently, have found that blacks probably never made up more than 20% of major leaguers.

-------

Baseball researchers still use a crude method to assign a single race to each player -- by gazing at baseball cards, flipping through media guides and judging whether surnames are Latino.

Comments
2008-10-10 12:11:48
1.   bobsbrother
And for those that follow the link, the person mentioned is not me.
2008-10-10 12:41:56
2.   Chyll Will
Maybe if so many individuals and institutions did not freely and/or conveniently interchange race with ethnicity, the numbers would be less ethereal across all forums. You may be able to make a case for less indigenous African Americans as an ethnicity in MLB, but I doubt less Blacks as a whole. One of the problems is the still-existing negative stigma attached to being defined as "Black" in this and perhaps more-so in other countries. Gen. Raphael Trujillo for one made strong efforts to erase or obfuscate objects, artifacts or appearances of African descent in his country (D.R.) and the effects still exist to this day.

That is not to demonize such cultures on this subject, but to point out the obvious stumbling blocks in relating the true percentages of diversity based on race in MLB today.

2008-10-10 13:23:57
3.   Cliff Corcoran
There's no doubt that diversity in baseball is higher today than it's ever been. We not only have both white and blacks born in the continental United States, but Hawaiians, Puerto Ricans, Dominicans, Venezuelans, Mexicans, Panamanians, Cubans, Colombians, Arubans, Curacoans, Nicaraguans, Japanese, Koreans, Taiwanese, Australians, and those exotic Canadians.

The issue isn't "diversity" on the field. The issue is the declining presence of African Americans specifically, and the emphasis is there in large part because of the significance baseball has had in the civil rights movement in this country.

The problem is that once you start trying to define "African American" on a player-to-player basis, you're going to run into trouble (Does Derek Jeter count? Did Jamaican-born Chili Davis count?) not only because the line blurs, but because drawing a line between the races (or nationalities for that matter, consider Alex Rodriguez's flip-flopping between being "American" or "Dominican" prior to the last World Baseball Classic) for the purpose of such counts is something of a racist act in and of itself.

Certainly there are a number of African American players in the game who are dedicated to organizations such as RBI because they want kids from their neighborhoods to have the same opportunities (or better) and love for the game that they had. But counting "black" players doesn't seem like the right way to measure their success.

2008-10-10 13:45:36
4.   rmr
My god. Look at how the percentage of whites has fallen since 1946.
2008-10-10 15:19:26
5.   Chyll Will
3 I agree, don't see where we don't. Intent is the issue. I recall a discussion of this nature coming up two seasons ago, in which I commented that the accessibility to the higher echelons of competition were hindered in many ways to African Americans in general, chiefly by economic opportunity. Now it's nearly impossible for me to accurately gauge personal interest from my basement, but might I add to this that I'll bet just by taking a gander at prevailing media images that there's not a whole lot of encouragement to play the game beyond casual recreation, something RBI is addressing directly.
Post a comment   (Help)

To comment, please log in.

Not a member? Register!