39 There's a pretty good chance he won't give up a homer to the second batter he faces, other than that, you'll have to check in 2009 (maybe late 2008, if Kershaw somehow makes AA this year)
Oh yeah, he's been hitting 92 on the gun. Hamels looks like a sterotypical bro from San Diego. I don't mind rooting for Lincecum because I don't think the Giants are going to be competition in a couple of months.
41 Although Baseball America had Lincecum as their second rated college player, their mock drafts had him going after 10.
Jim Callis did say after the Giants took Lincecum that they kept their analysis close to the vest so it was not surprising they took him although the players that he projected for them were also available.
Kershaw was projected to go to either the Dodgers at 7 or the Tigers at 6 and he was the first high school player expected to be picked.
73 The idea. I feel like there's a lot of pressure put on aging men to maintain some sort of Hugh Hefner level of virility; if they don't they're cast as defective when obviously it's biologically natural for the sex drive to wane. Granted, I'm only 21 so maybe I'm misunderstanding the issue.
By the third inning, Lincecum had already lost velocity, pitching at 93-94 MPH instead of 96-97, like he was in the first inning. Nothing wrong with 93-94, mind you, but the tiny body does have a consequence. And Lincecum's secondary stuff is not what it was made out to be. Lincecum is about a month older than Billingsley, and I know that if both pitchers were free agents, I would take Billingsley over Lincecum any day of the week.
Not sure who I'm listening to over MLB radio, but they just said that Jimmy Rollins was the second-best hitter in the National League this year, after Bonds.
[80] i think they aren't putting pressure so much as capitalizing on a segment of men who want to have more sex but whose bodies are holding them back. perhaps you could argue that when the equipment stops working you should just accept it and not worry about sex anymore, but depending on how old you are when it happens, it may not be that easy to accept.
My six-year-old daughter, playing with her Legos in our TV room, just said, "How come they're talking so much during this game? Talk, talk, talk, and they're not even talking about the game."
I did not locate a similar poll about Aaron and Ruth done in 1973 or 1974 in the New York Times or LA Times.
From my recollection, there were a lot of people who didn't want Aaron to break Ruth's record, but they were almost all portrayed as racists. The Bonds/Aaron dispute is a little different, although Aaron probably finds all of this respect shown him by the media to be somewhat unusual.
Here is a 2006 First Round update, tell me who should have picked Lincecum.
1. KC Luke Hochevar rhp $3,500,000 (Bonus)
2. CO Greg Reynolds rhp $3,250,000
3. TB Evan Longoria 3b $3,000,000
4. PI Brad Lincoln rhp $2,750,000
5. SE Brandon Morrow rhp $2,450,000
6. DT Andrew Miller lhp $3,550,000
7. LA Clayton Kershaw lhp $2,300,000
8. CIN Drew Stubbs of $2,000,000
9. BA Bill Rowell 3b $2,100,000
10. SF Tim Lincecum rhp $2,025,000
Hochevar, Reynolds, Longoria are in AA, Lincoln had "Tommy John" surgery in April 2007(note that Pittsburgh GM said this may mean that for the Pirates, they may not draft pitchers in the first round anymore).
Morrow is in Seattle, Miller is in High A ball, Kershaw and Stubbs are both in Low A in the Midwest League and Rowell is in extended spring training waiting for the short season Rookie Leagues to start in June.
Miller did get a taste of the Big club last fall and Lincecum joins Morrow as being part of their big league parent.
Hochevar, Longoria, Miller and Kershaw are picks that I don't think anyone would argue against their teams making before Lincecum but the others, hmmm.
Nate and anyone other draft guys, what do you think?
Tiny Tim steadily lost velocity throughout the game, and I never once saw a secondary offering that impressed me. For all the hype we have been hearing about Lincecum, I was wondering why nine teams, including the Dodgers, passed on him in the draft, but now it is pretty clear why. He might even be better suited to be a reliever than a starter, given how much velocity he loses, and that body is not going to get bigger. In last year's draft some teams took some players they shouldn't have over Lincecum (Drew Stubbs, by the Reds, for crying out loud), but no way would I have wanted Lincecum over Kershaw. Logan White was not remiss.
I'd rather have Lincecum then Hochevar, Reynolds, Lincoln, Morrow, and Stubbs.
Nate is right, the Giants never should have sniffed him. I think it would have been awesome if Hochevar had ended up a Giant so he could fire up the dying rivalry.
Victorino is quickly becoming one of my favorite players. Those who thought he was only 4th outfielder material might be having 2nd thoughts this week.
115
How can you make comments like that when Billingsley struck out as many as he walked last year over 90 innings and yet you still think he has a great future. This was his 1st start, I think I'd watch a few more games before making declarations like that.
11 ARI Max Scherzer rhp
12 TEX Kasey Kiker lhp
13 CHC Tyler Colvin of
14 TOR Travis Snider of
15 WAS Chris Marrero 3b
16 MIL Jeremy Jeffress rhp
17 SD Matt Antonelli 3b
18 PHI Kyle Drabek rhp/ss
19 FLA Brett Sinkbeil rhp
20 MIN Chris Parmelee of/1b
21 NYY Ian Kennedy rhp
22 WAS Colton Willems rhp
23 HOU Max Sapp c
24 ATL Cody Johnson 1b
25 LAA Hank Conger c
26 LAD Bryan Morris rhp
27 BOS Jason Place of
28 BOS Daniel Bard rhp
29 CWS Kyle McCulloch rhp
30 STL Adam Ottavino rhp
Max Scherzer remains unsigned and Boras thinks that he will be available in the 2007 draft. Morris had TJ surgery and Bard just got put on the DL.
127 Starfleet Headquarters was in San Francisco and they had that scene when the Klingon Bird of Prey flew under the Golden Gate Bridge before splashing into the bay.
BTW, my impression has always been that the bay is very cold but I guess not cold enough to bother the crew of the Enterprise.
118 -- I don't think the earliest MLB numbers are important, for any prospect. Most players get off to rough starts in the majors, and Billingsley debuted in his age 21 season while Lincecum is in his age 23 season. I don't hold the runs Lincecum gave up tonight against him, because it is not about the line in the boxscore at this stage. I am talking about scouting, future projection, and that means looking at tools and physicality. Billingsley has the pitching frame of a horse, Lincecum that of a pre-pubescent girl (a bit of hyperbole, but you get my drift). Billingsley has two plus breaking pitches, while Lincecum's curve does nothing for me. The velocity I saw from Billingsley on friday and today is better than what he ever showed in the majors last year, and you may say that is because he is in the bullpen, but as a starter in the minors Billingsley was always in the 92-96 range. Everybody makes a big deal about Billingsley's K:BB ratio last year in the majors, but I didn't care about that nearly as much as I did the fact that his fastball velocity was more like 89-93 than 92-96. This spring Billingsley said he had a "dead arm" in the majors last year, so with that explanation the only thing I was worried about is removed.
121 -- Billingsley has never pitched in the PCL at as old an age as Lincecum. I know you have said you don't care about age differences, but they make all the difference in comparing stats, and sabermetricians acknowledge that. And what was Linceum's home park in Fresno is very pitcher-friendly compared to Vegas.
I remember being really intrigued by Michael Bourn when he was in the minors. He doesn't have much power, but has outstanding plate discipline. I'd love to see what we could do with 500 major league at bats. I'd definitely take him over Pierre (though defensively he profiles better in left field).
111 Belated reaction but after staring at that list more, the one team that really stands out to me as having made a mistake not drafting Lincecum (or Miller or Kershaw, or the other pitchers picked after) is Tampa Bay. Not a knock on Longoria, who I think is going to be great, but for a team so rich with young position players/prospects and so pitching poor it seems unfathomable they wouldn't have looked for a pitcher. That's just my opinion, and it's hard to feel bad about having Longoria in your system, but I really think not taking one of those superb pitchers was a mistake.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.
on principle though, giants shouldn't be allowed to be compared to the immortal sandy k.
www.ColeHamelsFacts.com
Here comes COLE!!
i dont know, im torn. what i do know is that the giants should had no chance to even sniff lincecum at 10.
Hamels is like a better Randy Wolf and instead of a curve its a change up.
you mean, 4,092 mph
You mean Hamels'. Or Hamels's.
Jim Callis did say after the Giants took Lincecum that they kept their analysis close to the vest so it was not surprising they took him although the players that he projected for them were also available.
Kershaw was projected to go to either the Dodgers at 7 or the Tigers at 6 and he was the first high school player expected to be picked.
Yes, I'm watching ESPN and TBS at the same time.
I'm just thinking about his right arm being exposed to the pitcher.
Only about, what, 680 behind Mr. Bonds now...that one was definitely a pretty sight to see though!
those 92-94 fbs are 2 seamers though with wicked movement to them.
At least she hasn't asked you what "ED" stands for.
But I would have something made up to use just in case.
Earnest Dinosaur is my choice.
From my recollection, there were a lot of people who didn't want Aaron to break Ruth's record, but they were almost all portrayed as racists. The Bonds/Aaron dispute is a little different, although Aaron probably finds all of this respect shown him by the media to be somewhat unusual.
That was Gameday's scoring as well. They don't have an error up for Vizquel, but he has to get one.
1. KC Luke Hochevar rhp $3,500,000 (Bonus)
2. CO Greg Reynolds rhp $3,250,000
3. TB Evan Longoria 3b $3,000,000
4. PI Brad Lincoln rhp $2,750,000
5. SE Brandon Morrow rhp $2,450,000
6. DT Andrew Miller lhp $3,550,000
7. LA Clayton Kershaw lhp $2,300,000
8. CIN Drew Stubbs of $2,000,000
9. BA Bill Rowell 3b $2,100,000
10. SF Tim Lincecum rhp $2,025,000
Hochevar, Reynolds, Longoria are in AA, Lincoln had "Tommy John" surgery in April 2007(note that Pittsburgh GM said this may mean that for the Pirates, they may not draft pitchers in the first round anymore).
Morrow is in Seattle, Miller is in High A ball, Kershaw and Stubbs are both in Low A in the Midwest League and Rowell is in extended spring training waiting for the short season Rookie Leagues to start in June.
Miller did get a taste of the Big club last fall and Lincecum joins Morrow as being part of their big league parent.
Hochevar, Longoria, Miller and Kershaw are picks that I don't think anyone would argue against their teams making before Lincecum but the others, hmmm.
Nate and anyone other draft guys, what do you think?
1. Lincecum
2. Longoria
3. Kershaw
4. ?
5. ?
6. Hochevar
Nate is right, the Giants never should have sniffed him. I think it would have been awesome if Hochevar had ended up a Giant so he could fire up the dying rivalry.
Victorino is quickly becoming one of my favorite players. Those who thought he was only 4th outfielder material might be having 2nd thoughts this week.
How can you make comments like that when Billingsley struck out as many as he walked last year over 90 innings and yet you still think he has a great future. This was his 1st start, I think I'd watch a few more games before making declarations like that.
Now think of his second one.
When Willie Mays was traded to the Mets and Juan Marichal pitched for the Dodgers.
Its way to early on either pitcher, but if you're going by their past performance: Its Lincecum easily.
12 TEX Kasey Kiker lhp
13 CHC Tyler Colvin of
14 TOR Travis Snider of
15 WAS Chris Marrero 3b
16 MIL Jeremy Jeffress rhp
17 SD Matt Antonelli 3b
18 PHI Kyle Drabek rhp/ss
19 FLA Brett Sinkbeil rhp
20 MIN Chris Parmelee of/1b
21 NYY Ian Kennedy rhp
22 WAS Colton Willems rhp
23 HOU Max Sapp c
24 ATL Cody Johnson 1b
25 LAA Hank Conger c
26 LAD Bryan Morris rhp
27 BOS Jason Place of
28 BOS Daniel Bard rhp
29 CWS Kyle McCulloch rhp
30 STL Adam Ottavino rhp
Max Scherzer remains unsigned and Boras thinks that he will be available in the 2007 draft. Morris had TJ surgery and Bard just got put on the DL.
Did anybody else hear them mention that aircraft carrier across the bay in Alameda and immediately think of Star Trek IV?
I saw Star Trek IV and I have no idea what you're referring to.
BTW, my impression has always been that the bay is very cold but I guess not cold enough to bother the crew of the Enterprise.
http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Alameda
hes probably better then pier one.
teams picking 1-9 should have all picked lincecum :)
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.