Baseball Toaster The Griddle
Help
A place where a man can slow down to a walk and live his life full measure, but he has to keep his watch on Pacific Time.
Frozen Toast
Search
Google Search
Web
Toaster
The Griddle
Archives

2009
02  01 

2008
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2007
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2006
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2005
12  10  07 
06  05  04  03 
Suggestions, comments, ring the catcher's interference alarm?

Email me at btimmermann@gmail.com

The stuff I keep track of
Random Game Callbacks

Select a date:

Personal favorites that I wrote
FAQs
Same as it ever was? 50 years of sports and PEDs
2007-11-13 00:45
by Bob Timmermann

Dr. Keith Wailoo of Rutgers University has an essay in today's New York Times about the American Medical Association's research into "pep pills" in sports. This study took place 50 years ago.

In 1957, the American Medical Association began an investigation of “pep pills” in sports. In track and field alone, a dozen runners had run the four-minute mile in the three years since Roger Bannister first did it. How could this be possible, the doctors wanted to know, without stimulating drugs? Were athletes using amphetamines to stimulate the nervous system, reduce fatigue and improve performance?

Adding to suspicions, some athletes admitted turning to drugs for extra pep. Bruno Banducci, an offensive lineman for the San Francisco 49ers in the 1950s, acknowledged using the amphetamine Benzedrine to maintain his endurance. “We players did this on our own,” he said, taking team doctors off the hook.

Australian Olympic swimmers were under a similar cloud; even high school athletes were suspected. For others, the goal was relief and tranquillity after the tough performance. Al Aber, a pitcher for the Detroit Tigers, and other teammates said their team doctor prescribed tranquilizers to ease muscular and nervous tension.

An article by John Hoberman, a University of Texas professor, also examined this topic in greater detail, especially in regard to milers, in Sport and History in 2006.

Comments
2007-11-13 05:35:31
1.   D4P
This is why I'm not convinced that "sacred" baseball records are necessarily sacred after all.
2007-11-13 09:11:30
2.   wireroom
David Segui made a good point when he said in a recent interview that nobody makes an issue out of cortisone shots being injected to players when it is in essence enhancing performance. What exactly is cortisone?
2007-11-13 09:18:31
3.   Bob Timmermann
Cortisone is a steroid, although not an anabolic steroid.
2007-11-13 10:35:16
4.   wireroom
That's what I thought. I was pretty sure it was a steroid. Segui compares HGH to taking a cortisoen shot.
2007-11-13 11:19:54
5.   Bob Timmermann
4
That's almost, but not quite, entirely wrong.
2007-11-13 11:20:49
6.   Bob Timmermann
5
That is David Segui is wrong.
2007-11-13 13:05:42
7.   El Lay Dave
6 is right, of course. (Timmermann would never lead us astray.)

The beginner's version is that cortisone, a steroid, is an anti-inflammatory medication. It does not build muscle mass, while an anabolic steroid does.

Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.